ALTU-237 — Reloxaliase (oxalate decarboxylase)

Allena Pharmaceuticals, Inc. · Hyperoxaluria and recurrent calcium oxalate kidney stones · Oral recombinant oxalate decarboxylase

140 submissions · 1,962 documents · Cleared 14 Jul 2007

About this submission

IND for an oral recombinant enzyme treating enteric hyperoxaluria. Instructive for sponsors developing oral biologics — non-systemic delivery, GI-tract pharmacology, and enzyme stability data are all atypical for Module 3.

Complete INDs almost never see daylight — and this is the deepest one in the archive: sixteen years and roughly 140 FDA submissions for a non-absorbed oral enzyme that degrades oxalate in the gut, sparing the kidneys from the stones and damage oxalate overload causes. Begun at Altus Pharmaceuticals as ALTU-237 and carried forward by Allena, the file runs from a 2006 pre-IND meeting through two Phase 3 trials (URIROX-1 and URIROX-2). If you're learning how a program actually talks to the FDA over its lifetime, it's an unusually complete worked example of surrogate-endpoint strategy, accelerated-approval negotiation, and multi-generation CMC scale-up.

“We would not accept a small change in 24-hour urinary oxalate excretion as a basis for full or accelerated approval … merely showing a statistically significant difference between ALLN-177 and placebo … will not provide a sufficient basis for approval.”
— FDA, End-of-Phase-2 meeting minutes, 19 Jul 2017

What the FDA dialogue reveals

  • A surrogate-endpoint negotiation, start to finish. The whole program turned on one question: can lowering urinary oxalate — a lab value — support approval without first proving fewer kidney stones? The FDA said no at End-of-Phase-2 (2017) and again in 2018, then agreed an accelerated-approval path in Dec 2018 — but only with a model linking the surrogate to actual stone outcomes. About three years from ask to alignment, all in the record.
  • The FDA holds a position — consistently. Across years it repeats and cites its own prior letters. Read in sequence, the minutes are a tutorial in how the agency reasons and where it won't move.
  • A designation denied, candidly. A Breakthrough Therapy request was rejected even though the FDA agreed the disease was serious — the supporting data (seven patients, several on dialysis, which itself clears oxalate) were judged too thin. A clear-eyed lesson in the evidentiary bar for designations.
  • CMC as a marathon. The manufacturing process was rebuilt across four generations (FFDB → Lonza → intermediate → full scale) — a real template for managing comparability through scale-up.

Best studied for

Surrogate-endpoint and accelerated-approval strategy in nephrology / metabolic disease · Type A/B/C and End-of-Phase-2 meeting preparation · CMC comparability across manufacturing scale-up · long-horizon IND lifecycle management.

Related reading

Reading Between the Lines: What the FDA Says vs. What It MeansA field guide to FDA correspondence, drawn from complete INDs in the archive.

Browse the complete eCTD package — 1,962 documents across Modules 1–5 — cover letter, administrative forms, summaries, CMC, nonclinical, and clinical study reports. Free account required.

Create free account →

More dossiers in the archive